Development of Frequency Step Tunable 1 MW Gyrotrons in D-Band

 

M. Thumm1,3), A. Arnold3), E. Borie1), G. Dammertz1), O. Drumm1), R. Heidinger2),

M.V. Kartikeyan1), K. Koppenburg1), A. Meier2), B. Piosczyk1), D. Wagner4), X. Yang1)

 

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Ass. EURATOM-FZK, 1)IHM, 2)IMF I,

76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
3)Universitaet Karlsruhe, IHE, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

4)Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, Ass. EURATOM-IPP, Boltzmannstr. 2,

85748 Garching, Germany

E-mail: manfred.thumm@ihm.fzk.de, Phone: ++49 7247 822440, Fax: ++49 7247 824874

 

Introduction

The availability of MW gyrotrons with fast frequency step tunability (several GHz/s, tuning in 2-3 GHz steps for approximately 10 different frequencies) permits the use of a simple fixed, non-steerable mirror antenna for local electron cyclotron plasma heating and current drive (EC H&CD) and plasma stabilization in thermonuclear fusion research.

Successful gyrotron experiments at FZK Karlsruhe employing a 140 GHz, TE22,6-mode cavity, a quasi-optical (QO) mode converter with dimple-type launcher, a broadband silicon nitride composite Brewster angle window and a single-stage depressed collector (SDC) gave up to 1.6 MW output power (pulse duration: 1-5 ms) at efficiencies between 48 and 60% for the entire operating mode series in the frequency range from 114 to 166 GHz (TEm,5 with
m = 18 to 22, TEm,6 with m = 20 to 26 and TEm,7 with m = 22 to 26) [1].
Frequency tuning in steps of approximately 3.7 GHz was achieved by slow variation (in minutes) of the magnetic field strength in the cavity. Recently, similar results have been achieved at IAP Nizhny Novgorod employing a 140 GHz, TE22,8-mode cavity in 50 ms-pulse operation [2].

The FZK gyrotron was also investigated with respect to fast tunability (in seconds) [3]. For that purpose, the tube was operated in a special hybrid magnet system consisting of the superconducting magnet in the cryostat and additional normal conducting (NC) magnets at cavity and gun, with a fast switching time constant. Problems due to the magnetic coupling between the different magnets were solved by using a current control system for the NC-magnets. Finally, step-tuning operation between five modes from 132.6 GHz (TE20,6) to 147.4 GHz (TE24,6) at MW power levels in time steps of 1 s was achieved [3].

The different operating modes have approximately the same radius of the electric field maximum (caustic) in the cavity and must have the same sense of rotation so that the coupling to the electron beam is comparably good and the pattern and direction of the mm-wave output beam are very similar [1]. Special broadband quasi-optical output couplers for different modes and different frequencies have to be employed. Other challenges in the development of such frequency tunable gyrotrons are the proper electron gun and the SDC operating in varying magnetic field.

1 MW, 105-140 GHz, 10 s Gyrotron

A new EC H&CD system is under development for the ASDEX-Upgrade tokamak at IPP Garching [4]. Four 1 MW gyrotrons with SDC will generate 4 MW power with a pulse duration of 10 s. The first gyrotron is being built at GYCOM-N and can work at 140 GHz (TE22,10) and 104 GHz (TE18,7), making use of the resonances of the conventional CVD-
diamond vacuum window at these frequencies.
A second step-tunable gyrotron is designed to work at several frequencies within the same interval (TE17,6 mode at 105 GHz and TE22,8 at 140 GHz). A CVD-diamond output window mounted at the Brewster angle will allow broadband transmission. The diameter of the synthetic diamond disk for this window will be 120-140 mm. The QO mode converter and the window unit have been developed in collaboration between FZK Karlsruhe and IAP Nizhny Novgorod.

Textfeld: Fig. 1:	Horizontal plane field distribution of the TE22,8 mode excited at 140 GHz by the new mode generator.
A new QO mode generator for low power tests has been designed and fabricated. Here a Gaussian beam is focused onto a mode specific caustic through the translucent wall of a coaxial cavity. First measurements of the output field pattern showed a very good performance at most of the gyrotron output frequencies (e.g. Fig. 1). Since all operating modes of a step-tunable gyrotron have a similar structure, with their caustic radius being approximately half the cavity radius, only one set of resonator and lenses is required. Only a minor readjustment of the QO components is needed for generation of different modes.

Textfeld: Fig. 2:	Calculated output patterns on a plane 
50 mm behind a Vlasov antenna (left side) and a Denisov-type antenna (right side) shown for the TE22,8 mode.

The QO mode converter of the gyrotron consists of a dimpled-wall antenna (Denisov-type launcher) and a beam forming mirror system optimized for nine  modes from TE17,6 to TE23,8 [5]. For these modes the dimpled-wall antenna shows a well focused beam with low diffraction losses (Fig. 2). The first mirror is a large quasi-elliptical one, the second and third are phase correcting mirrors with a non-quadratic shape of the surface. These two mirrors were also optimized for broadband operation in the various design modes.

First measurements on a 1.923 mm thick, 120 mm diameter chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-diamond disk showed a homogeneous distribution of the loss tangent in an elliptic area, which can be used for the Brewster angle window. The measured values of the complete disk are between about 2 x 10-5 and 8 x 10-5. The median of the loss tangent is
3.6 x 10-5. Due to the ellipitical shape of the Brewster window only the best area of the disk will be used. A 140 mm diameter disk for a full-size diamond Brewster angle window is being developed at Element Six (formerly DeBeers Industrial Diamonds).

[1]   M. Thumm, et al., Fus. Eng. and Design 53 (2001) 407-421.

[2]   V.E. Zapevalov, et al., Proc. 27th Int. Conf. on IRMMW, San Diego, USA, 2002, pp. 1-2.

[3]   K. Koppenburg, et al., IEEE Trans. on Electron Dev. 48 (2001) 101-107.

[4]   F. Leuterer, et al., 22nd Symp. on Fusion Techn. (SOFT), Helsinki, 2002, paper C17.

[5]   E. Borie et al., IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science 30 (2002) 828-834.