Real-time Imaging of THE MEMBRANE CHARGING OF MAMAlian cells exposed to
nanosecond pulsed Electric fields.
W. Frey2, K. Baumung2, J.
Kolb, N. Chen, J.White1, S.J. Beebe1, K.H. Schoenbach
Old Dominion University, Center for
Bioelectrics, Norfolk, VA 23510
1Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23510
2Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, D76021, Karlsruhe, Germany
ABSTRACT: When exposing cells to nanosecond pulsed electric fields, the classical
electroporation theory, which only considers a charging and a subsequent
poration of the outer cell membrane, is not sufficient to explain the observed
effects, such as apoptosis followed by caspase activation and DNA fragmentation
[1]. A possible explanation would be intercellular membrane charging and subsequent
pore formation, which is already supported by experiments [2] and by the
results of modeling [3]. In order to study the primary effect of ultrashort
electrical pulses on biological cells, the membrane charging, diagnostic
methods with a temporal resolution in the nanosecond range are required.
An Olympus
IX71 inverted fluorescence microscope was used to study the membrane charging
of HL-60 cells, exposed to ultrashort, intense electrical pulses. The cell
membranes were stained with the potential sensitive dye di-8-anepps. The cell
suspension was located in a 100 µm gap between two stainless steel
electrodes. The electric field pulse was provided by a 50 W Blumlein pulse generator switched by a fast
HV-MOSFET. The maximum field strength was 100 kV/cm. The cells were
exposed to pulses in the nanosecond range.
Instead of
using a fast camera for image acquisition, the required temporal resolution was
achieved by illuminating the cells with a 10 ns long, 2nd
harmonic Nd:YAG laserpulse (532 nm). The time of illumination was varied
during the pulses. The images were recorded by a high-resolution CCD-camera.
First results show a fluorescence response to 10 ns pulsed laser
radiation. The contribution will present further results, illustrating the
membrane charging process of cells, exposed to nanosecond pulsed electric
fields.
[1] Beebe
SJ, White J, Blackmore PF, Deng Y, Somers K, Schoenbach KH (2003) DNA and Cell Biology 22(12): 785-796.
[2] Deng J, Schoenbach KH, Buescher ES, Beebe SJ (2003) Biophysical Journal 84(4): 2709-2714.
[3] Schoenbach KH, Buescher ES, Beebe SJ (2001) Bioelectromagnetics 22: 440.
This study
was funded by an AFOSR DOD MURI grant on “Subcellular Response to Narrow Band
and Wide Band Radio Frequency Radiation”, administered by Old Dominion
University. We acknowledge the support from Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH.