Representing local accumulations of minor defects in ductile cast
iron by an appropriate material model
M. Suty, H.-C. Schneider and O. Kraft
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for
Materials Research,
P.O. Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
Mechanical components in nuclear engineering are
subject to strong safety requirements. Especially thick-walled castings require
appropriate mechanical testing and Finite Element calculations. A crucial point
is the consideration of minor defects. Those are difficult to avoid
consistently but do not necessarily affect
the structural integrity of castings. By now, local
accumulations of such defects are conservatively enveloped and replaced by one
large defect with a well known geometry.
In general, material parameters are obtained by
testing tensile and impact specimens taken out of the cast. The challenge is to
extract a set of significant test specimens according to the licensing and
testing standards without unduly weakening the casted component.
In this work, an alternative approach is described for
considering cast defects such as voids in ductile cast iron or porous plastic
metals. A material model successfully used to homogenize porous structures is
adapted to the mechanical behaviour of the affected area which is included in
calculations.
In order to validate the model spherical defects are
represented in two dimensions by drilled holes (1.2 mm) in flat bar tension
specimens, with sufficient sample dimensions to avoid boundary effects (60x100x4
mm³). Finite Element calculations furnish stress distributions in the
experiments. The micromechanical
Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model is applied to represent the behaviour of the
cast iron with the holes. This approach still gives a conservative description
of the influence of small voids or other defects on the safety of large casting
components for defect dimensions up to 100 times the size of the graphite
spheres.
First results of tensile tests will be presented. The drilled
holes reduce the tensile strength by 5 % from 380 MPa to 360 MPa considering a net
cross-sectional reduction of 6 %. The implications of
these findings are discussed in the context of the described model.